![]() |
|
|
呂英仁醫師
|
|
Introduction: Chromosomal
anomalies account for a large percentage of early pregnancy losses,
congenital malformations and postnatal functional impairments.
Conventional prenatal genetic diagnosis involves obtaining fetal/trophoblastic
samples during late first trimester (chorionic villi sampling, between
8-10 wks GA) or early second trimester (amniocentesis, between 15-17 wks
GA). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity are high, although with
the inconvenience of having to terminate pregnancy relatively late and
the associated risks of late abortion. However,
with the wide spread use and mature procedures of artificial
reproductive technology (ART), new approaches to have genetic diagnosis
before embryonic implantation are possible, or even before conception
takes place, thus saving the patient from the traumatic experience of
therapeutic abortion. In
this brief discussion, attempts are made to describe available methods
of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), advantages and
disadvantages. Obtaining
samples for PGD: The sources for PGD come from 3 mayor procedures: 1.
Polar body biopsy: The so called preconception diagnosis. The
first polar body extrude from primary oocyte after meiosis I, which
contains a haploid set of chromosomes but double genetic materials, as
each chromosome is composed of 2 chromatids. If the genetic disease in
question is recessive, the genotype of oocyte can be inferred indirectly
by knowing the karyotype of the first polar body. However the situation
might be complicated by the fact that crossing over occurs during
prophase of meiosis I, specially if the gene is located far from
centromere or within telomeric loci. In such cases, biopsy of second
polar body becomes necessary.The
advantage of polar body biopsy is that diagnosis is made before
conception, with ample time to implantation. However, the procedure is
technically difficult and only maternal genetic material is assessed. 2.
Trophectoderm biopsy: Human
blastocyst is obtained usually after 5 days of in vitro culture, which
is composed of inner cell mass and trophectoderm. More cells, with less
fragmentation and degeneration, are disposable for further manipulation.
Nevertheless, the source of blastocyst is scarce, since fertilized eggs
reach blastocyst stage in only 20-25% under the best circumstances and
trophectoderm biopsy has not been applied clinically.
3.
Cleavage stage biopsy: In
human 8 cells pre-embryo, up to 3 blastomeres can be excised without
compromising its developmental competence to blastocyst stage. Usually 1
or 2 blastomeres are extracted by "drilling" a hole in zona
pellucida and then remove blastomeres by aspiration or extrusion. It is
the clinically most used method. Preimplantation
diagnosis methods: 1.
DNA
methods:
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Primer extension pre-amplification
Southern blotting
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
Short tandem repeat (STR) 2.
Enzymatic methods: unreliable ( due to
persistent maternal enzymes) 3.
Histological methods: sex chromatin and F body 4.
Growth in
vitro:
male embryo grows faster than female embryo. Polymerase
chain reaction (PCR): Few
cells obtained in PGD require highly sensitive and specific DNA
diagnostic methods. PCR use a thermo-stable polymerase (Taq) to
synthesize copies of target DNA sequences. Millions of copies can be
made within several hours, which are then analyzed with electrophoresis
or other methods. Variations of the original PCR were developed
recently: nested primers, heteroduplexing, restriction fragment length
polymorphism (RFLPs), etc. Fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH): Fluorochrome-labeled
DNA probes were designed to identify centromeres or other structures of
the chromosome arms in a histological specimen. Fluorochromes of
different colors can be used simultaneously to give a mapping of target
chromosomes. Result can be available within 6-8 hs. Conclusion: PGD is accomplished through several steps that require highly trained procedures, like ART, micromanipulation, blastomere biopsies, and DNA analyses. Not every infertility center will be capable of such facilities, but its value in early diagnosis of sex-chromosome linked or autosomal diseases is promising. Since aneuploidy is suspected to be a mayor cause of implantation failure of morphologically normal embryos, the implantation rate could be improved by selecting only those embryos with normal karyotyping for implantation, with the additional benefit of reducing the number of embryos transferred and the risk of multiple pregnancy. |