![]() |
|
|
Ⅰ.Human papillomavirus: A DNA tumor virus with a doule-strand close circular DNA genome of 7900 bases.More than 70 types identified with most of them associated with the skun infection andabout 27 types infect the ano-genital mucosa.It encodes 8 genes which express 14 protin products. Function of HPV transcripts: |
|
E1: act on origin of replication to induce episomal DNA replication. |
|
A productive life cycle of HPV depends on the differention of squamous epithelium. So far it is very difficult to culture HPV. The identification of HPV relies on DNA detection. The weak systemic antigenicity makes serological test both insensitive and nonspecific. | |
Ⅱ.Human Papillomavirus and Cervical
Cancer: |
|
1.Epidemiology: |
|
PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF HPV BASED ON AMINO ACID SEQUENCES
|
|
About 50-80% of CIN patient have HPV infection, 90% or more human cervical cancers contain HPV DNA. Those remaining HPV(-) cervical cell lines have p53 or RB gene mutation. The most prevalent HPV type in cervical cancer is type 16, folloewd by type 18, 31, 33. In Taiwan and fareast countries, type58, next to type 16 is the second most prevalent type. The prevalence of HPV infection in genital tract is about 25% of female less than 55 years old. The lifelong risk of HPV(+) women to develop cancer is about 3.7%. It usually takes 20 to 50 years. |
|
2.Patholphysiology:
|
|
HPV
Transmission
• Cutaneous HPVs are transmitted casually. • Genital HPVs are transmitted sexually.
Important variables for acquisition:
-
Age at first intercourse
-
Number of sex partners
-
Coincident STDs - Immunc status |
|
(B)Integration of HPV DNA into host genome |
|
B) E6 and E7 oncogenes |
|
Expression of the high risk HPVs may lead to aneuploidy (change of chromosome number) and contribute to the other cellular events necessary for a full cancer development. III. Perspective of HPV Infection Disease |
|
●Cancer associated HPV’s are found in 95% of CIN 2 & 3 vs. 10% of normal women, yielding a relative risk estimate of 80:1l |
|
HPV
Infection linked to progressin from CIN 2 to 3 to invasive cancer
|
|
●Cross sectional data show strong, consistent relationship between specific |
|
HPV is a Diagnostic Test supplementing a screening program“Screening tests are relative simple procedures, designed to separate healthy persons from those who may have disease. They are not intended to be diagnostic but to identify patients who require a formal evaluation…….the use of HPV testing conforms to the basic philosophy of clarifying the nature and prognosis of any underlying disease” R. Reid, A. Lorincz New Generation of HPV Tests 1996. |
|
Management of Equivocal Cytology
results
|
|
■THEORY |
|
HPV is found un at least 95% of all HSIL |
|
■APPLICATION | |
AS a supplement or Triage for Atypical / ASCUS / AGUS Smears, either in conjunction with second smear or on its own (this way a test can be performed earlier than the 3-5 month delay necessary before a second smear can be taken, and referral based on the HPV shows better sensitivity than second Pap smear. |
|
■BENEFIT | |
Patient is able to get information earlier than waiting for second Pap smear, which can relieve some anxiety and validate an earlier referral to colposcopy.Women could avoid a colposcopy and less colposcopies would be performed.(Pathology services are retained and increases market value before being referred to gynecological services)
Subsequent screening cycles and management could be improved. |
|
■THEORY | |
Cytology in peri-and post mennopausal women is problematic; relative proportion of positive smears representing invasive cancer increases 17 times in 40 year olds vs 20 year olds; cytologic false negative ratea rise with age due to transformation zone recession into the cervical canal; falis positives rise in this age group becaouse of the confounding effects of estrogen deficiency. |
|
■APPLICATION | |
HPV high risk positivity in older women is indicative of long term persistent infection, and higher risk for developing dysplasia. |
|
■BENEFIT | |
Ease the concern of some clinics about the biannual not being sufficient as a screening cycle. They continue to recommend annual. HPV testing would identify those that would benefit from annual screens, as well as alternate technologies. |
|
Risk Assessment
|
|
■THEORY | |
HPV High Risk Detection in Pap Smear negative women is predictive of an increased risk of subsequent detection of CIN, Cox Obstet & Gyn Clinics of Nth America 1996; Vol 23:811-851 |
|
■APPLICATION | |
Women over 30 could be assessed for theur HPV status as a means of determining risk for developing cervical disease.Test for the cause rather than wait for the effect. |
|
■BENEFIT | |
Suggestive of closer scrutiny and more reqular Pap smears. |
|
Management of Low-Grade Cervical Disease; Predicting Regression, aPersistence, or Progression of Untreated CIN1
|
|
■THEORY | |
Most LSIL will regress (median value from # studies is 48% regress,and 12% progress),and trestment
(intervenyion) should be based on presence of high risk HPV.Research has demonstrated that greater than 95% of HSIL and cancers contain oncogenic HPV, whereas very few non specific inflammatory/reparative changes will be colonized by such viruses. Alternative screening technologies are increasing the number of LSIL smears, if all were referred the additional vvisits will overwelm the colposcopic services and result in unnecessary intervention. |
|
■APPLICATION | |
Treatment of CIN 1 or LSIL would be specifically indicated if patient was HPV high risk
postive. A more conservative or “wait and see” approach could be adopted on the HPV negative patients. |
|
■BENEETTS | |
Patients would have a treatment option. Gynaecologists would prioritize referrals based on HPV result, and could immediately treat evev where there was minimal aceto white presence. It situations where the colposcope was normal, the HPV result would support regular cytologic follow up.
|
|
Management of Equivocal HISTOLOGY |
|
■THEORY | |
Postive HPV test would identify a subset of women who have either occult SIL missed at initial colposcopy or an emerging lesion that will manifest in the near future. |
|
■APPLICATION | |
A negative or equivocal result is reported in approx 30% of patients who have directed biopsy for LSIL (Montz 1992). The decision to continue to triage or treat versus suspending work-up or returning patient to cytological follow up is difficult. A normal Coposcope and negative HPV result confer a negative predictive valug greater than 98%.Virus testing obviates any clinical concern over sighificant cyto-histologic discrepancy. |
|
■BENEFIT | |
HPV could be used to manage biopsy equivocal patients, to determine follow up and cytology and/or colposcopic cycles. Reduce anxiety in proportion of patients. |
|
Viral Load significant marker to managem and follow-up of LSIL Post Treatment |
|
■THEORY | |
Measuring quantitative levels of HPV DNA may increase the predictive vaiue of HPV testing as a detection tool for HSIL. |
|
■APPLICATION | |
Additional consideration when considering management options in HPV positive women. Assists in determining a conservative treatment approach or a more aggressive approach in CIN 1 and equivocals. |
|
■BENEFIT | |
Assist in women determining what management option they should consider. |
|
■THEORY | |
The recurrence rate of CIN post treatment is usually around 10-15%.After treatment for HSIL, presence of HPV determines the screening and management options for the patient. |
|
■APPLICATION | |
If subsequent to treatment Pap smears are negative, & HPV high risk negative, the women can return to normal screening. |
|
■BENEFIT | |
Ability to give some long term prognosis to the patient, and a way of indicating whether there is further risk, or chances of re-occurrence of disease.In young women where repeated cervical ablation or may have severe consequences on fertility, HPV may be an objective method of determining patients at greatest risk. |