Incontinence, Urinary: Surgical Therapies

INTRODUCTION Section 2 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic

Urinary incontinence is a medical condition that has significant negative effect on the quality of life. It causes social stigma, financial hardship, and associated medical problems. Affected individuals often delay seeking treatment due to shame and embarrassment. Urinary incontinence is not a normal part of the aging process. This is a condition that has multiple etiologic factors.

Urinary incontinence may be divided into 2 broad categories.

  1. Urge incontinence
  2. Stress incontinence

Pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of therapy for urge incontinence. Surgery and physiotherapy are 2 primary treatment options for stress incontinence.

With recent advances in medical technology and better understanding of female anatomy and physiology, many innovative surgical methods are available for correction of stress incontinence. This chapter will review these surgical options.

History of the Procedure: Described by Kelly in 1913, the anterior vaginal repair is the oldest surgical procedure for correction of stress incontinence. Kelly believed the cause of stress incontinence was an incompetent urethra. The anterior vaginal repair was designed to correct this condition.

In 1949, the Marshall-Marchetti-Kranz (MMK) procedure was described. The suspension sutures were placed within the urethral wall and tied to the periosteum of the pubic symphysis. The original MMK procedure was complicated by urethral obstruction and erosion because the surgical sutures were placed directly into the urethral wall.

In 1961, Burch reported a modification of the MMK procedure. The modifications involved placing the surgical sutures at the bladder neck and tying them to the Cooper's ligament.

The original transvaginal bladder neck suspension was described by Peyrera in 1959. Many modifications of the Peyrera transvaginal bladder neck suspension exist today. They include Stamey (1975), Raz (1981), and Gittes (1987) bladder neck suspensions. Although initial success rates were quite promising, the long-term success rate with transvaginal bladder neck suspensions has been disappointing.

In contrast, pubovaginal slings are gaining in popularity for all types of female stress urinary incontinence. Historically, the indication for pubovaginal sling procedure was limited to women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. However, it has been expanded to include Type II stress incontinence.

The current trend is to perform pubovaginal slings or retropubic urethropexy for correction of urethral hypermobility. The long-term success rate of pubovaginal sling is reported to be comparable to retropubic urethropexy.

Problem: Stress urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine coincident with increased intra-abdominal pressure in the absence of uninhibited detrusor contraction.

Type I stress urinary incontinence is defined as urine loss occurring in the absence of urethral hypermobility. This is the mildest form of SUI. Patients with Type I SUI have a Valsalva Q-tip angle less than 30 degrees an abdominal leak point pressure greater than 120 cm H2O.

Type II stress urinary incontinence is defined as stress incontinence due to urethral hypermobility. Patients with urethral hypermobility have a Valsalva Q-tip angle greater than 30 degrees and abdominal leak point pressure more than 90 cm H2O.

Type III stress urinary incontinence is defined as stress incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric dysfunction (ISD). Patients with ISD have Valsalva Q-tip angle less than 30 degrees and abdominal leak point pressure less than 60 cm H2O.

Frequency:

Etiology:

In cases of stress urinary incontinence secondary to ISD, previous pelvic surgery, radiation and sympathetic nerve dysfunction are all etiologic factors.

Pathophysiology:

Clinical:

INDICATIONS ¡@
RELEVANT ANATOMY AND CONTRAINDICATIONS ¡@

Relevant Anatomy: The female urethra is a 4-cm, elongated tube composed of an inner epithelial lining, a spongy submucosa, a middle smooth muscle layer, and outer fibroelastic connective tissue. The spongy submucosa contains a rich vascular plexus that is responsible for providing adequate urethral occlusive pressure to create the "washer effect," an important female continence mechanism. Urethral smooth muscle and fibroelastic connective tissues serve to circumferentially augment the occlusive pressure generated by the submucosa.

All parts of the female urethra are influenced by estrogen. The lack of estrogen at menopause leads to atrophy and replacement of the submucosa (vascular plexus) by fibrous tissue. Lack of estrogen is one of the risk factors for ISD; replacement of estrogen may reverse the effects of ISD. When estrogen is given to a postmenopausal woman with atrophic vaginitis, the mucosa regains its turgor with simultaneous up-regulation of alpha receptors and angiogenesis of the vascular plexus. Previous bladder neck operations, radiation, and neurogenic disease can also affect the ability to achieve a perfect seal.

Contraindications:

WORKUP Section 5 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic

Lab Studies:
¡@

Other Tests:
¡@

Diagnostic Procedures:
¡@

TREATMENT ¡@

Surgical therapy: Operations for urethral hypermobility

Surgical procedures for urethral hypermobility reposition the bladder neck into a normal anatomic position at rest and during physical exertion. When the bladder neck is in the correct anatomic position, it stays closed during periods of increased abdominal pressure. The 3 main types of procedures used for correction of urethral hypermobility are retropubic bladder neck suspension, transvaginal suspension, and pubovaginal sling.

Retropubic or transvaginal needle suspension is recommended over anterior vaginal repair for hypermobility. Retropubic and transvaginal suspension procedures are superior to anterior repair in “curing?stress incontinence.

For hypermobility with coexisting ISD, the surgical procedure should stabilize the anatomic support and compress the urethra, which means using one of the sling procedures. Pubovaginal slings produce better long-term outcomes than transvaginal bladder neck suspensions for correction of urethral hypermobility.

¡@

Operations for intrinsic sphincter deficiency

Procedures for managing ISD include sling procedures, periurethral bulking injections, and placement of an artificial urinary sphincter.

Sling procedures are recommended for women who have ISD alone or ISD with coexisting hypermobility. Periurethral bulking injections are recommended as first-line treatment for women with ISD who do not have coexisting hypermobility. Artificial sphincter is recommended for ISD patients who are unable to perform intermittent catheterization and have severe SUI that is unresponsive to other surgical treatments.

¡@

Preoperative details:

Intraoperative details:

Postoperative details:

COMPLICATIONS ¡@

Serious complications from operations that correct stress incontinence occur very infrequently. Complications common to bladder neck suspensions and pubovaginal slings include the following: urinary retention, de novo or worsening obstructive voiding symptoms, urinary tract infection, suture abscess, wound infection, retropubic bleeding, vaginal granuloma, vesicocutaneous fistula, de novo pelvic prolapse, bladder perforation, prolonged suprapubic pain, and ilioinguinal nerve entrapment.

The current incidence of urethral obstruction ranges from 5-10% for anti-incontinence operations. Urinary retention is temporary in most cases, but it may last a month or more. While the condition lasts, clean intermittent catheterization should be performed. Less serious complications, such as wound infection, occur more frequently but are easily treated with antibiotics. The likelihood of needing a blood transfusion is less than 5% for all procedures.

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

¡@

FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIES ¡@

The management of long-term urinary retention after a sling surgery remains controversial. Postoperative urinary retention may be treated with indwelling catheter, intermittent catheterization, cutting of suspension sutures, incision of the sling itself, or complete urethrolysis with or without repeat sling procedure.

Acute urinary retention is initially treated with indwelling urethral catheter or self-intermittent catheterization. If a suprapubic tube had been placed intraoperatively, SPT is left indwelling. In majority of cases, patients are able to void spontaneously within three weeks and catheterizations are discontinued.

If urinary retention persists at three weeks, pressure-flow study must be performed to document a well-functioning detrusor and rule out urethral obstruction. If the patient has atonic detrusor, she needs long-term catheterization, intermittent or otherwise.

If the patient has a normal detrusor function, an alternative to intermittent catheterization is to takedown one or both suspension sutures. This procedure is performed by going through the original suprapubic incision and cutting ipsilateral suspension sutures. This may be done under local or general anesthesia. If the patient still remains obstructed after cutting the suspension sutures, one should perform urethrolysis.

Timing of urethrolysis is controversial. If urinary retention occurs after a rectus fascial sling, urethrolysis is recommended after three months of urethral obstruction. If urethral obstruction results after a synthetic sling, urethrolysis should be performed earlier than three months.

Regardless of the sling material used, this author recommends early intervention (usually at three weeks) rather than delayed since the patient's quality of life is impaired during the duration of retention.

Formal urethrolysis of autologous sling involves complete dissection circumferentially around the bladder neck and proximal urethra. Conversely, urethrolysis of a synthetic sling may require only an incision of one or both arms of the sling rather than complete dissection of an autologous sling.

After urethrolysis of rectus fascial sling, one may choose to place another autologous sling to prevent recurrent stress incontinence. If urethral injury is encountered, the urethral injury is repaired primarily and either Martius fat pad (fat pad from labia majora), omentum, or posterior peritoneum may be used to reinforce the closure. Whether to proceed with another sling at the time of urethrolysis should be tailored to each individual patient. At our institution, we have not resorted to placing a second sling as all our patients have remained continent after formal urethrolysis.

Despite these potential complications, it is important to realize that pubovaginal sling is an excellent operation for all types of female stress urinary incontinence. Many types of sling operations abound. Sling surgeries may involve autologous tissue, synthetic biomaterials, and cadaver allografts. A particular type of operation chosen depends on the patient’s preference and the surgeon’s expertise. When performed properly, the long-term cure rate of sling surgery should approach 90% with minimal complications.

The future of anti-continence surgical therapy is bright and promising. With advances in biomechanical engineering coupled with clinical and basic science research, our understanding of the incontinence disease process and the development of new surgical options are increasing rapidly. With current evolution of stem cell research and genetic engineering, more minimally invasive and technologically advanced surgical procedures will be forthcoming in the near future.

BIBLIOGRAPHY ¡@