|
INTRODUCTION |
¡@ |
Background: In 1847, Renaud
first described fallopian tube malignancy. In 1888, Orthmann submitted the first
genuine case report.
The broad ligament is a double fold of peritoneum, which is formed by the
reflection of the peritoneum off the pelvic floor and the lateral pelvic wall.
Most tumors are benign cysts, but malignant tumors are categorized as either
primary or secondary.
Primary malignancies of the broad ligament
Müllerian origin - Serous, papillary, cystadenocarcinoma, endometrioid
carcinoma (CA), clear cell CA
Urothelium transitional cell CA
Mesenchymal sarcoma, histiocytoma
Pheochromocytoma
Secondary malignancies of the broad ligament - Metastatic from endometrial,
cervical, and ovarian CA
A primary malignancy is diagnosed by its location within or on the surface of
the broad ligament and by complete separation of the tumor from the uterus and
ovaries.
¡@
Pathophysiology: Fallopian tube malignancy usually starts as
a dysplasia or carcinoma in situ. Ideally, transition to adenocarcinoma is
observed.
The etiology of malignancies of the broad ligament is unknown, although it is
associated with endometriosis.
Frequency:
¡@
- In the US: Fallopian tube CA comprises 1% of all
gynecologic cancers. The average annual incidence is 3.6 cases per 1,000,000
women.
Mortality/Morbidity: On average, the 5-year survival rate
was 51%: Stage I (65%), Stage II (50-60%), and Stages III and IV (10-20%).
Age: The rate rises with age but peaks at 60-66 years.
|
CLINICAL |
¡@ |
History:
- Malignant lesions of the fallopian tube: Patients may present with pelvic
pain, a pelvic mass, postmenopausal bleed, and serosanguineous vaginal
discharge. The classic description as hydrops tubae profluens, which is
characterized by colicky lower abdominal pain relieved by a profuse, serous,
watery, yellow, intermittent, vaginal discharge usually is not found.
- Malignant lesions of the broad ligament: A clinical history of vague
abdominal pain; on examination or on abdominal exploration, adnexal mass is
found. Rarely, it can manifest as an acute abdominal emergency, simulating
appendicitis.
Physical: Physical examination findings are not specific; a
pelvic mass usually is present, with or without ascites.
- Grossly, the main tumor should be in the fallopian tube.
- Histologically, the tubal mucosa should be involved, with a papillary
pattern.
- The tubal wall, if involved, and a transition from benign to malignant
tubal epithelium should be identified.
- The lesion is a more advanced stage of tubal tumor than the other
tumors.
Causes: The exact etiology is unknown. Infertility and
chronic salpingitis were believed to lead to an increase in incidence, but this
theory is not proven, although malignancy has been associated with tuberculous
salpingitis.
Similar to ovarian malignancy, BRCA germline mutation and p53 mutation are
associated with fallopian tube malignancy.
|
DIFFERENTIALS |
¡@ |
Other Problems to be Considered:
Benign fallopian tube disease salpingitis (eg, tuberculosis salpingitis)
Benign ovarian disease
Ovarian tumor of low malignant potential
Malignant epithelial ovarian tumors
Broad ligament tumors
|
WORKUP |
¡@ |
Lab Studies:
¡@
- Investigations usually are for postmenopausal bleeding.
- Papanicolaou smear test, showing malignant glandular cells
- CA-125 tumor marker assay is performed for follow-up study as a marker for
response to therapy.
Imaging Studies:
¡@
- Hysterosalpingogram - Can detect intraluminal growth
- Color Doppler - Can detect neovascularization and low resistance indices
- Three-dimensional ultrasound - Detects papillary protrusions, pseudoseptae,
tumoral lakes, microaneurysms, and arteriovenous (AV) shunting
- Ultrasound - Detects adnexal mass
Histologic Findings:
Serous CA - 50%
Endometrioid CA - 25%
Transitional cell CA - 11.7%
Undifferentiated CA - 7.8%
Mixed CA - 3.9%
Clear cell CA - 1.9%
Staging: Although the fallopian tubes are derived from the
same embryonic structure as the uterus, histologically and clinically, malignant
lesions of the fallopian tubes behave like ovarian tumors. Unlike ovarian
tumors, 50% of fallopian tube tumors are Stage I and II, whereas usually, more
than 50% of ovarian malignancies are in stage III and IV.
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) fallopian
tube staging
- Stage 0 - CA in situ (limited to tubal mucosa)
- Stage I - Growth limited to the fallopian tubes
- Stage Ia - Growth limited to 1 tube, with extension into the submucosa
and/or muscularis but not penetrating the serosal surface; no ascites
- Stage Ib - Growth limited to both tubes with extension into the
submucosa and/or muscularis but not penetrating the serosal surface; no
ascites
- Stage Ic - Tumor stage 1a or 1b but with tumor extension through or
onto the tubal serosa, or with ascites present containing malignant cells,
or with positive peritoneal washings
- Stage II - Growth involving 1 or both fallopian tubes with pelvic
extension
- Stage IIa - Extension and/or metastasis to the uterus and/or ovaries
- Stage IIb - Extension to other pelvic tissues
- Stage IIc - Tumor stage IIa or IIb, with ascites present containing
malignant cells, or with positive peritoneal washings
- Stage III - Tumor involves 1 or both fallopian tubes, with peritoneal
implants outside the pelvis and/or positive retroperitoneal or inguinal
nodes. Superficial liver metastasis equals stage III. Tumor appears limited
to the true pelvis but with histologically proven malignant extension to the
small bowel or omentum.
- Stage IIIa - Tumor is limited grossly to the true pelvis, with
negative nodes but with histologically confirmed microscopic seeding or
abdominal peritoneal surfaces.
- Stage IIIb - Tumor involves 1 or both fallopian tubes, with
histologically confirmed implants on abdominal peritoneal surfaces, none
exceeding 2 cm in diameter. Lymph node findings are negative.
- Stage IIIc - Abdominal implants larger than 2 cm in diameter and/or
positive retroperitoneal or inguinal nodes
- Stage IV - Growth involves 1 or both fallopian tubes, with distant
metastases. If pleural effusion is present, positive cytology results must
be present to be stage IV. Parenchymal liver metastases equal stage IV.
- Staging for fallopian tube is by the surgical pathological system.
Operative findings designating stage are determined before tumor debulking.
- Modified FIGO staging for fallopian tube CA
- Stage 0 - CA in situ (limited to tubal epithelium)
- Stage I - Growth limited to tube
- Stage IA - Growth limited to 1 fallopian tube, without extension
through or onto serosa, ascites containing malignant cells, or positive
peritoneal washings
- Stage IA-0b - Growth limited to 1 fallopian tube, with no extension
into lamina propria
- Stage IA-1b - Growth limited to 1 fallopian tube, with extension into
lamina propria but no extension into muscularis
- Stage IA-2b - Growth limited to 1 fallopian tube, with extension into
muscularis
- Stage IB - Growth limited to both fallopian tubes, without extension
through or onto serosa, ascites containing malignant cells, or positive
peritoneal washings
- Stage IB-0b - Growth limited to both fallopian tubes, with no
extension into lamina propria
- Stage IB-1b - Growth limited to both fallopian tubes, with extension
into lamina propria, but not extension into muscularis
- Stage IB-2b - Growth limited to both fallopian tubes, with extension
into muscularis
- Stage IC - Tumor either Stage IA or IB, but with extension through or
onto tubal serosa, with ascites containing malignant cells, or with
positive peritoneal washings.
- Stage I(F) - Tumor limited to fimbriated end of fallopian tube(s),
without invasion of tubal wall
- Stage II - Tumor involving 1 or both fallopian tubes, with pelvic
extension
- Stage IIA - Extension and/or metastasis to uterus and/or ovaries
- Stage IIB - Extension to other pelvic tissues
- Stage IIC - Tumor either stage IIA or IIB, with ascites containing
malignant cells or with positive peritoneal washings
- Stage III - Tumor involving 1 or both fallopian tubes, with peritoneal
implants outside pelvis, including superficial liver metastasis, and/or
positive retroperitoneal or inguinal nodes; tumor limited to pelvis except
for histologically proven extension to small bowel or omentum
- Stage IIIA - Tumor grossly limited to pelvis, with negative nodes but
with histologically confirmed microscopic seeding of abdominal peritoneal
surfaces
- Stage IIIB - Tumor involves 1 or both fallopian tubes, with grossly
visible, histologically confirmed implants of abdominal peritoneal
surfaces, none exceeding 2 cm in diameter. Lymph node findings are
negative.
- Stage IIIC - Abdominal implants larger than 2 cm in diameter and/or
positive retroperitoneal or inguinal nodes
- Stage IV - Growth involves 1 or both fallopian tubes, with distant
metastases, including parenchymal liver metastases. If pleural effusion is
present, fluid must be positive cytologically for malignant cells.
¡@
- Modification in terminology - Modifications to accommodate subsets of
tumor that otherwise cannot be assigned a stage or to distinguish among
subsets that may differ in their associated prognosis
|
TREATMENT |
¡@ |
Medical Care: Medical care depends
on frozen section and pathology results, as follows:
- Stage 0 - CA in situ
- Negative cytology results - No further treatment
- Positive cytology results - Intraperitoneal phosphorous 32 (32P)
or short-term cisplatin therapy
- Stage I
- Negative cytology results - No treatment or short-term cisplatin
- Positive cytology results - Intraperitoneal 32P or short-term
cisplatin therapy
Stage II-IV
- Bulky residual disease or positive nodes - Cisplatin-containing regimens
- No residual disease, negative nodes - Short-term cisplatin or
intraperitoneal 32P
¡@
- Residual disease in pelvis - Cisplatin regimen or whole-abdomen
radiation with pelvic boost; however, as with ovarian malignancy, patients
with fallopian tube malignancy also have an increase in the 5-year survival
rate with Taxol and cisplatin
- Various chemotherapy cycles
- Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP)
- Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin (CP)
- Taxol and cisplatin (TP)
- Topotecan alone is used for first-line chemotherapy, and it can be used
for recurrent disease.
- Treatment of broad ligament malignancy is similar to that for fallopian
tube malignancy except in young patients, in whom wide local excision can be
adequate.
Surgical Care: Surgical care includes (1) total abdominal
hysterectomy (TAH) with (2) bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), (3)
omentectomy and peritoneal washing, and (4) selective pelvic and paraaortic
lymphadenectomy.
|
FOLLOW-UP |
¡@ |
Further Outpatient Care:
¡@
- Patients usually are observed using CA-125 assay to monitor response to
therapy. If a rise in CA-125 is noted, investigations such as CT scan and
laparoscopy can be performed. Any evidence of disease can be treated with
chemotherapy and/or debulking surgery.
Prognosis:
¡@
- Prognosis depends on the following factors:
- Stage of the malignancy - Highly significant prognostic factor
- Absence of fimbriated end closure - Adversely affects prognosis
- Presence or absence of invasion of tubal wall, depth of invasion when
present, location of the tumor within the tube (ie, fimbriated or
nonfimbriated)
- Presence of p53 mutation is associated with poor prognosis.
- Ascites and patient age do not seem to affect prognosis because the
prognosis depends on the location of the tumor within the fallopian tube and
the depth of invasion of tumor; therefore, Navani suggests modification of
FIGO staging.
|
MISCELLANEOUS |
¡@ |
Medical/Legal Pitfalls:
¡@
- Fallopian tube and broad ligament malignancies are rare gynecological
malignancies. Diagnosing these malignancies at an early stage is difficult
because of the lack of symptoms or nonspecific symptoms. Diagnosis usually is
an incidental finding; therefore, medicolegally, it is possible that patients
can sue due to failure to diagnose it at an early stage or preoperatively. In
addition, no standarized treatment exists; usually, these conditions are
treated in a similar manner to ovarian cancer intraoperatively. Chemotherapy
or radiotherapy after surgery depends on individual preferences.
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY |
¡@ |
- Alvarado-Cabrero I, Young RH, Vamvakas EC: Carcinoma of the fallopian
tube: a clinicopathological study of 105 cases with observations on staging
and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol 1999 Mar; 72(3): 367-79[Medline].
- Aslani M, Scully RE: Primary carcinoma of the broad ligament. Report of
four cases and review of the literature. Cancer 1989 Oct 1; 64(7): 1540-5[Medline].
- Ben-Hur H, Dgani R, Ben-Arie A: Diagnostic dilemmas and current therapy of
Fallopian tube cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1999; 20(2): 108-9[Medline].
- Berek J, Hacker N: Practical Gynecologic Oncology. 3rd ed. Lippincott;
546.
- Danforth DN, Scott JR: Diseases of the ovary and fallopian tube. In:
Danforth's Obstetrics & Gynecology. 8th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
1999: 889.
- Dieste MC, Lynch GR, Gordon A: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the broad
ligament: a case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 1987 Oct; 28(2):
225-9[Medline].
- Disaia PJ, Creasman: Carcinoma of the fallopian tube. In: Clinical
Gynecologic Oncology. 5th ed. Mosby Inc; 1997: 375-380.
- Dunton CJ, Neufeld J: Complete response to topotecan of recurrent
fallopian tube carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2000 Jan; 76(1): 128-9[Medline].
- Fedele L, Cittadini E, Bortolozzi G: Successful in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer after limited surgical treatment for tubal adenocarcinoma.
Cancer 1989 Oct 1; 64(7): 1546-7[Medline].
- Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Jacobs I: Preoperative diagnosis of the primary
fallopian tube carcinoma by three- dimensional static and power Doppler
sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000 Mar; 15(3): 246-51[Medline].
- Latner AL, Turner GA: Effect of aprotinin on immunological resistance in
tumour-bearing animals. Br J Cancer 1976 May; 33(5): 535-8[Medline].
- Loverro G, Cormio G, Renzulli G: Serous papillary cystadenoma of
borderline malignancy of the broad ligament. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
1997 Aug; 74(2): 211-3[Medline].
- Navani SS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Young RH: Endometrioid carcinoma of the
fallopian tube: a clinicopathologic analysis of 26 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1996
Dec; 63(3): 371-8[Medline].
- Orthmann EG: Primareskarzinom in Einertuberkulosen. Ztschr Geburtsh Gynaek
1888; 15: 212.
- Ricci JV: One Hundred Years of Gynecology. Blackiston, Philadelphia: 1945.
- Rose PG, Shrigley R, Wiesner GL: Germline BRCA2 mutation in a patient with
fallopian tube carcinoma: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 2000 May; 77(2): 319-20[Medline].
- Rosen AC, Ausch C, Hafner E: A 15-year overview of management and
prognosis in primary fallopian tube carcinoma. Austrian Cooperative Study
Group for Fallopian Tube Carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1998 Oct; 34(11): 1725-9[Medline].
- Rosen AC, Ausch C, Klein M: p53 expression in fallopian tube carcinomas.
Cancer Lett 2000 Aug 1; 156(1): 1-7[Medline].
¡@