Figure 2 - 1995

Figure 2.
Previous English Language Studies Examining Patients with Atypical Pap Smears to have CIN When Screening the General Population for Cervical Dysplasia.

E.J. Mayeaux, Jr., M.D.
Associate Professor of Family Medicine
Clinical Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Louisiana State University Medical Center Shreveport, Louisiana

% with Standard or Study n CIN End Point Year Note ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kohan et al. (44) 86 70% Colposcopy 1985 Squamous Atypia Kohan et al. (44) 162 22% Colposcopy 1985 Inflammatory Atypia on Repap Walker et al. (45) 182 67% Colposcopy 1985 Soutter et al. (14) 78 37% Colposcopy 1986 On repap had CIN II or worse Reiter (46) 110 45% Unknown 1986 On repap Jones et al. (18) 236 25% Colposcopy 1986 Noumoff (20) 286 27% Colposcopy 1987 Squamous Atypia Noumoff (20) 72 32% Colposcopy 1987 Inflammatory Atypia Morrison (21) 139 25% Colposcopy 1988 Ridgley (47) 119 19% Colposcopy 1989 On Repap Andrews et al. (22) 172 28% Colposcopy 1989 On Repap Pearlstone et al. (48) 101 18% Unknown 1992 Massad et al. (49) 137 38% Colposcopy 1993 Average 35%

Controversies and Decision Making for Uterine Cervical Disease

Colposcopy Atlas Table of Contents

Return to LSUMC-S Clinical and Academic Medicine Home Page

Return to the LSUMC-S Home Page.

LSUMC-S Family Medicine. Write to us if you have comments or questions! EMayea@lsumc.edu

Figure 2. Previous English Language Studies Examining Patients with Atypical Pap Smears to have CIN When Screening the General Population for Cervical Dysplasia.

Figure 2.
Previous English Language Studies Examining Patients with Atypical Pap Smears to have CIN When Screening the General Population for Cervical Dysplasia.