|
Home > Statistics Every Writer Should Know > The Stats Board > Discusssion
RMS vs standard deviation versus standard error I'm confused on two issues. 1. All references I can find for "standard error" calculated it as ste = std/sqrt(n), where std is the standard deviation, and define it as an estimate for the standard deviation of the mean if the sampling was repeated many times. Yet Excel has some function called the standard error (STEYX) that requires 2 sets of inputs (X,Y), uses a more complex calculation using both x and y (more like a correlation), and outputs something different than std/sqrt(n). What is this Excel standard error?
Is RMS equivalent to any of them for a zero mean?
READERS RESPOND: Re: RMS vs standard deviation versus standard error Excel's STEYX function is applied in linear regression. With y as the dependent variable and x as the independent variable, STEEYX is the conditional standard deviation of y given x. Jack
Re: RMS vs standard deviation versus standard error
Re: RMS vs standard deviation versus standard error The different dispersion statistics yield different values because each statistic characterizes the dispersion of the data in a slighly different way, there is little to recommend one of there dispersion statistics over the other. In my opinion the use of within sample standard deviation (for Control Charting) is a better way to estimate the standard deviation, but each application has its own dispersion statistic.
Your $5 contribution helps cover part the $500 annual cost of keeping this site online.
|
|||||||||
|