Congratulation: Our coronary interventional team received a silver medal in the category of Specialty Feature of Hospitals and Clinics in 2006 from SNQ National Committee of Quality Grading for Biotechnology and Health Care

最新消息˙教學研究˙醫療新知˙獲獎經歷


國內
Formosan Medical Association
Taiwan Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
Taiwan Society of Cardiology
Taiwan Society of Cardiovascular Intervention
Bureau of National Health Insurance
國外

American College of Cardiology 

American Heart Association 

North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology 

American Society of Hypertension 

European Society of Cardiology 


電話:+886 7 731-7123-ext.8300/ 2363
傳真:+886 7 732 -2402
地址:123,TA PEI ROAD,NIAO SUNG HSIANG, KAOHSIUNG CITY, TAIWAN, R.O.C. 83301
信箱:tang@cgmh.org.tw

您是第 18220 人造訪心臟內科網站

 

Index > Medical News
Relations of Biomarkers of Distinct Pathophysiological Pathways and Atrial  
Circulation. 2010;121:200-207 

Background—Biomarkers of multiple pathophysiological pathways have been related to incident atrial fibrillation (AF),
but their predictive ability remains controversial.
Methods and Results—In 3120 Framingham cohort participants (mean age 58.49.7 years, 54% women), we related 10
biomarkers that represented inflammation (C-reactive protein and fibrinogen), neurohormonal activation (B-type natriuretic
peptide [BNP] and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide), oxidative stress (homocysteine), the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
system (renin and aldosterone), thrombosis and endothelial function (D-dimer and plasminogen activator inhibitor type
1), and microvascular damage (urinary albumin excretion; n2673) to incident AF (n209, 40% women) over a median
follow-up of 9.7 years (range 0.05 to 12.8 years). In multivariable-adjusted analyses, the biomarker panel was associated with
incident AF (P0.0001). In stepwise-selection models (P0.01 for entry and retention), log-transformed BNP (hazard ratio
per SD 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 1.85, P0.0001) and C-reactive protein (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence
interval 1.07 to 1.45, P0.004) were chosen. The addition of BNP to variables recently combined in a risk score for AF
increased the C-statistic from 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.81) to 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.83) and
showed an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.03 (95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.04, P0.0001), with 34.9%
relative improvement in reclassification analysis. The combined analysis of BNP and C-reactive protein did not appreciably
improve risk prediction over the model that incorporated BNP in addition to the risk factors.
Conclusions—BNP is a predictor of incident AF and improves risk stratification based on well-established clinical risk factors.
Whether knowledge of BNP concentrations may be used to target individuals at risk of AF for more intensive monitoring or
primary prevention requires further investigation
 

 

 

 

高雄長庚紀念醫院 心臟內科 版權所有 最後更新時間:2018/9/21

網頁設計:王琨堯 [進入後端管理]